Sunday 30 April 2017 The one stop source for free breaking news, expert analysis, and videos on AIM and LSE listed shares


New World Oil & Gas; could it pay a shameful £1.15million in fees to Cornhill Capital?

By Ben Turney | Monday 22 June 2015


Disclosure: I own shares in one or more of the stocks mentioned. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.


I took a temporary vow of silence last week concerning New World Oil & Gas (NEW). We should learn soon enough whether my faith in the regulatory authorities was misplaced, but there is one issue I am compelled to speak out on; the sickening and unconscionable fees New World has agreed to pay Cornhill Capital in relation to the highly controversial open offer.

On June 11, New World announced its plan to raise £3.5million at 0.09p through an open offer and placing. It was bad enough that New World’s board ignored prevailing market demand for its stock, when it set this unacceptably low price. It was even worse that New World’s board also decided to forgo the opportunity to offer existing shareholders more favourable terms, to give them a chance to benefit properly. However, perhaps the most difficult aspect to stomach has been how much New World’s board has decided to pay Cornhill for its role.

Based on information contained in New World’s circular, Cornhill could stand to earn as much as £1.15million from this wretched deal.

As I explained in this article, two weeks ago, New World should have sacked Cornhill for its role in creating the forward selling fiasco. This directly caused the chaotic settlement situation in New World’s stock, cost New World over half its precious cash reserve (leaving it in a “precarious” financial position, as it admits in its open offer circular) and resulted in the prolonged suspension of the company from trading on the London Stock Exchange. That Cornhill now could stand to benefit to the tune of £1.15million from the deeply mispriced open offer heaps insult onto grievous injury.

How reliable is this £1.15million estimate?

Let’s begin with how much cash Cornhill could expect to earn as reward for a job not-so-well done.

New World’s anticipated net proceeds from the placing and open offer are only £2.8million. Given that the open offer is meant to be worth £3.5million, this begs the obvious question what will the £700,000 be spent on?

The answer is not on fees.

No, careful inspection of the circular reveals that Cornhill could well take the overwhelming majority of its fees in share payments. We can only speculate as to why Cornhill might have such an overwhelming desire for New World stock, but this leaves unanswered what will happen to the £700,000 cash.

For some logic-defying reason, New World’s board has agreed to pay Cornhill’s “out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in connection with the Placing”. This includes “the fees and expenses of Cornhill Capital’s legal advisers and any other professional advisers retained on either the Company’s or Cornhill Capital’s behalf” since its “engagement”. Given that this engagement has been backdated to April 20, it is entirely possible that this could cover costs incurred as a result of the original failed placement. The legal fees alone could have run to hundreds of thousands of pounds.

According to its RNS on April 29, New World had just over £600,000 in cash. This figure now stands at £290,000, so the company has already spent over £300,000 thanks to the forward selling fiasco. Are we seriously meant to believe that it has directly incurred another £700,000 in “expenses relating to the EGM”?

If New World hasn’t directly incurred such costs then the logical conclusion is that its advisors have. It could well be those that it has agreed to pay. I plan to ask the company for comment on this, so let’s see what response I get.

While I continue to hold my breath, let’s consider the fees we know Cornhill definitely expects to earn. These are as sordid as they are unpalatable:

  • For arranging the open offer, New World is going to pay Cornhill the equivalent of just over £408,000. This could be a through a combination of cash, share based payments and warrants. If New World decides to pay the full amount through equity, this will lead to the issue of an additional 454,341,848 shares.
  • New World is going to pay Cornhill an annual retainer worth £30,000, backdated to April 20. This is bad enough, but what is really shocking about this aspect of the deal is that New World has agreed if Cornhill decides to take the payment in equity, it will issue 65,454,545 shares in settlement. The issue price of these shares will be 0.046p.

It is bad enough that New World has backdated this arrangement with Cornhill, in light of its role as one of the main architects of the forward selling fiasco, but issuing equity at this price goes so far beyond the pale, it is impossible to see how this arrangement can be at all commercially justifiable.

  • Finally, and this bit just made me laugh, if Cornhill’s appointment as placing agent is terminated “prior to completion of the placement by election of the company” (in other words if there is a shareholder vote) it stands to gain a £25,000 termination fee.

I often wonder if I am on the wrong side of the fence in this AIM game. How can Cornhill’s appalling performance acting on behalf of New World in the last two months possibly deserve such rich reward?

Shame on all involved. 


Filed under:


Never miss a story.




This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.


More on NEW


Comments

2 comments


  1. DUCK AND DIVE

    Call the cops.

  2. AIM, and people like Cornhill and NEW are corrupt…simple


Enter your comment below. Fields marked * are required. You must preview your comment first before finally posting.




Site by Everywhen