By Nigel Somerville, the Deputy Sheriff of AIM | Wednesday 15 July 2015
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Having posed a few questions (HERE) about AIM-Cesspit poster boy Daniel Stewart Securities plc (DAN) and its unlisted plc subsidiary Daniel Stewart & Company plc, I’ve had something else pointed out by an avid reader. I wondered how it was that the parent company had managed to produce audited FY Mar14 results (albeit months after the deadline, which saw the shares suspended) when the subsidiary accounting for the vast majority of revenues had not. Given that the two share the same financial year, this seems all rather odd. And given that the parent was audited by PWC, how on earth has PWC been able to verify what is reported with reference to the contribution to group revenues (ie almost all of it) without itself auditing the subsidiary accounts?
Filed under:
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Monday »
Sunday »
Saturday »
Friday »
Thursday »
Wednesday »
Tuesday »
Time left: 03:49:43