Tuesday 17 January 2017 The one stop source for free breaking news, expert analysis, and videos on AIM and LSE listed shares


New World Oil & Gas – board fulfils first commitment to shareholders

By Ben Turney | Tuesday 1 September 2015


Disclosure: I own shares in one or more of the stocks mentioned. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.


This morning, New World Oil & Gas’ (NEW) board of directors was true to its word and published the company’s unaudited interim figures nearly a month early. The numbers are encouraging. The company had £2.9million cash on Friday, the executive directors have been offsetting all fees since March against their outstanding loans and the board continues not to draw salary or accrue benefits. The company is not yet out of the woods, but today represents a tangible step forward. Next up is the AGM…

Yesterday I wrote, “Change is coming at New World”. As I explained, this year’s AGM will give New World’s long-suffering shareholders the opportunity to decide on the future direction of the company. Before the meeting, the current board will host a conference call on 17 September to outline its vision for undoing all the damage it has caused. That call certainly promises to be entertaining, but it will require a Herculean effort from the directors to persuade their shareholders that they deserve the opportunity to deploy the company’s war chest.

I’ve promised to maintain a less inflammatory tone in my coverage of New World, but I would be amazed if the directors can garner sufficient shareholder support to grant them a mandate to take the company forward. The board tells us that through “utilising its oil and gas expertise and network, [it] has been actively evaluating projects that may have the potential to generate immediate or near-term cash-flow.” 

It will be interesting to find out more about the seven projects the board has identified that fit its criteria, but I remain sceptical. After all, the same “expertise and network” that has identified the projects also allowed the spending of $15million from April 2013 with nothing to show for it, introduced Niel Petroleum to the company, gave €1million to Dr. Alfahaid and spectacularly failed to capitalize on the summer’s naked short position through the dreadful mispricing of the open offer.

I could go on, but there is a simple point to make. At the AGM shareholders will have their change to decide on the company’s future. Will they decide to vote for more of the same or will they put their weight behind a white knight, should one emerge?


Filed under:


Never miss a story.




This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.


More on NEW


Comments

3 comments

  1. Sceptical please. This the UK not the USA.

  2. “actively evaluating projects that may have the potential to generate immediate or near-term cash-flow”

    Did they copy and paste that from a Sefton RNS? Or maybe they both copied and pasted it from “The Microcap Oil Explorer’s RNS Handbook for Dummies”?

  3. check out the 2nd RNS clanger: 1742hrs This announcement replaces RNS 5838X which was released by the Company on 1 September 2015 at 7.00 am. The change relates to the loss for the six months ended 30 June 2015, which was incorrectly stated in the Financial Review section as being US$894,000. This has been amended to the correct figure of (US$1,403,000), as was reported in the Financial Statement.


Enter your comment below. Fields marked * are required. You must preview your comment first before finally posting.




Site by Everywhen