Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

POS market abusers and cash guzzlers Environmental Recycling clarify KennyBoy Brooks loan

By Tom Winnifrith, The Sheriff of AIM

30 December 2015 03:56

More:

AIM casino listed Environmental Recycling (ENRT), formerly known as 3DM is worthless POS which has been twice censured by the FSA (today's FCA) for misleading investors. In clarifying the status today of an uber expensive loan it has taken from its founder, Kennyboy Brooks, it has just admitted to a third deception.

Already a member? Sign in

• All premium articles

• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast

• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive

• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter

Cancel any time

This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.

Comments

Duck and Dive

30 December 2015, 05:00

Ken has obviously got his eye on Len Fertig’s crown as the biggest and longest turd in the casino. But Len wouldn’t even consider lending cash on any terms to a moribund POS like MTV so he remains undefeated for now.

How’s your Fastjet bear tip doing, btw?

Nice of you guys to wake up eventually today.
Tom Winnifrith

30 December 2015, 05:10

D&D

Fuck off, I am in New York and got up at 3.45 am to edit this website. The prior night I stayed up to 3.45 am. You pay nothing to be here so try not to be such a snivelling & ungrateful little twerp in 2016 – easy NY 2016 resolution for you

t
Duck and Dive

30 December 2015, 05:46

I pay in clicks. If you change the business model, I’ll pay in $$$. Either way, I’m your customer.

And less of the “little” please.
Juicin Drumroll

30 December 2015, 06:54

TW,

You know I’m a fan but…….

2% per month was the rate Mrs Michael Laurier (wife of Symphony Environmental (SYM) headboy Michael Laurier) was charging the company on a loan she made to SYM. IIRC TW you were tipping SYM while this was going on & if I recall further I do not remember you excoriating the Lauriers for this corporate theft from their shareholders or even alluding to it. Ever. Even though it went on for far, far too long.

If you are going to be the Sheriff you have to dispense justice even handedly.

HNY.
Failed Investor

30 December 2015, 11:53

https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP10179017&tab=main
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP10179017&lng=en&tab=doclist

https://register.epo.org/application?documentId=EX3AXPXY2516DSU&appnumber=EP10179017&showPdfPage=all

Dated 07/10/15

If the applicants are prepared to make the changes suggested by EPO then it seems possible/likely that they will be Granted a Patent within the EU. Given EPO is making the ‘recommendations’ for that possible ‘Grant’ you might assume, if you trust their research and it is not challenged elsewhere, that the result will be applicable via other Patent Authorities elsewhere…. That’s ‘World Wide’.

Whether it is ‘commercially viable’ or otherwise significant, beyond a ‘ramp’, would be another question. However you might have to ask yourself…. Have those concerned filed amendments according to those recommendations, without notifying the markets of the ‘opportunity’ and, more importantly, have they received notification of acceptance of those amendments prior to the documents being published via EPO?