Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
I repeat my request re itunes - please go give Bearcast a 5* rating now. Then I refer to Amanda's piece earlier which is a compelling lesson in why its right to be a bear. Finally I explain why I am a mean bastard when dealing with Dr Harold Shipman, oops I meant Roger Lawson of ShareSoc.
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
RAF118
Tom – 5 star review from me. Massive fan of the Bearcasts since they began.
Keep up the great work
Scampi
Gordon Brown DID save the world! It’s in Hansard I believe and here is his announcement of the fact! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iPaiylUYW0
Re your comments about Lawson. I agree with you but surely you should practice what you preach? Do you remember the abuse you dished out to Ben Harrington when he broke the story about S & G purchasing Quindells assets? IIRC you went to town on him and heaped scorn on his story which turned out to be true.
I haven’t seen you offer one word of apology to him despite the level of abuse you dumped on him in several bearcasts at around that time.
Fair’s fair!
Drunken Sailor
Scampi,
Ben Harrington was a market abuser.
“Seven types of behaviour can amount to market abuse – see below for more detail. The examples illustrate
the abusive behaviour the Code covers.
1. Insider dealing – when an insider deals, or tries to deal, on the basis of inside information. Improper
disclosure and misuse of information are kinds of insider dealing
2. Improper disclosure – where an insider improperly discloses inside information to another person.
6. Dissemination – giving out information that conveys a false or misleading impression about an
investment or the issuer of an investment where the person doing this knows the information to be
false or misleading.”
Obviously it is hard to know at the time which variety of market abuse is being committed. However Harrington is now a proven market abuser under type 2. Given the proven ridiculous nature of the SGH bid anyone could be forgiven for thinking at the time it was type 6 abuse.
phil
How stupid is the world of Human Beings ?
Of all the people you would chose to repair broken economies we chose the fucking arseholes that broke them. Bankers
The premise is laughable, will it end in tears. Of course it will, it always does
wildrides
Agree on Lawson ………he is not trustworthy ……… Scotty only wants to kiss and make up because he sits on the same committee and its awkward for him to do otherwise .
Chrisg11
Hello Tom
I was just wondering what you thought of microsoft as a company as Im thinking of investing
Scampi
DS
Harrington is a journalist. His job is to break news stories and he specialises in M & A.
Would you accuse Tom of market abuse when he breaks stories about companies having placings underway? No, because Tom would come back with the same response.
All I am saying is that it’s a bit of double standards to expect an apology from Lawson for writing something on his blog when Tom hasn’t been big enough to apologise for the vitriol and abuse he heaped on Harrington at the time.
Tom Winnifrith
Scampi
You are correct in post 2. Except that I did publicly state that Harrington had been correct. In that we should congratulate him and I do but for 1 thing alone – the S&G scoop.
What is hard is that his source was Rob Terry et al and in putting out spin for a fraudster is a tough ethical call. Personally I would not do it, He got hos scoop – for which I did publicly acknowledge him – but he had to lye with fleas. Personally I;m happy I got my multiple scoops (the frauds) and had no such compromise to make