Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Edi Truell, the founder of Tungsten (TUNG) has today quit the cash guzzling disaster story following the board rejecting his latest hare brained corpororate proposals. Mad Edi stepped down as CEO last July ago but remained, until today, as a NED. Does this make the shares more or less attractive?
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
Duck and Dive
http://grammarist.com/spelling/harebrained/
Stuart Kaplan
“The Board of Tungsten has spent considerable time reviewing these suggestions…”
90% of it laughing uncontrollably I would imagine.
alcira16247
Tom
At its current 61 pence per share, Tungsten is capitalised at £70 million, which I’d suggest is about £70 million too much!
I’ve gotten more chance of walking on the moon than this flea ridden dog of a company ever has of making profits!
Its appalling record of prodigious cash burn since its birth on Aim is set to continue, as losses for the current year according to broker forecasts are pencilled in at over £26 million, derailing the new boards recent promises of positive cash generation in 2017.
Given that Tungsten has yet to demonstrate anything near a viable business model and its diabolical record surely make it a bargepole stock of the highest order?