Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
I am now feeling really very bruised by the whole Audioboom saga. Next time someone sends me an article and says "feel free to use this" I shall interpret it as "why not put this up and get slaughtered by the whole world bulls and bears and send your blood pressure through the roof. In today's BearCast I talk about ValiRX (100% vindicated not that I really care any more), Rex Bionics, Ultrasis, Mosman Oil and gas and why I am still bearish
Already a member? Sign in
• All premium articles
• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast
• Access to all the entire nearly 13 year archive
• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter
Cancel any time
This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.
Comments
Paul Scott
Hi Tom,
Interesting bearcast as always!
I agree with you that the EFH deal done by the CEO of OPAY was wrong. However, story has been around for about a month now – it triggered a big spike down in share price from c.400p to about 320p, and then within a week, the share price had recovered. It was a very nice trade for those of us who bought the dip. The company confirmed strong operational trading, which helped the shares recover rapidly.
Wind forward to last week, and the announcement that the CFO is being replaced caused an even bigger spike down in price, from c.400p to about 280p. This was a complete storm in a teacup, because there is no scandal – the company has simply decided to replace its CFO, and this is proven by the fact that they have announced the new chap, and that he starts soon. The old chap is staying on as a consultant for 3 months, which doesn’t happen if there is any underlying serious problem. Questor in the Telegraph then compounded the spike down with an article yesterday that just re-hashed the EFH stuff.
All of which has once again given a marvellous buying opportunity, which I took full advantage of, buying heavily from 320p down to 280p. Those purchases are now nicely in profit.
So my point is that whilst I fully accept & agree with your criticisms about the EFH deal done by the CEO, it really doesn’t matter in terms of how I value the company. It has again confirmed this week that trading is strong, and the shares are rated at only 13 times this year’s earnings, and just over 10 times next year’s earnings. That seems very good value to me, hence why I’m happy to buy them at this level.
In my view the events described might justify a say 5% dip in share price, but when they give you a 30% spike down, that is a buying opportunity, not a time to be panic selling, or shorting, in my opinion.
I always like the hear the bear case on any stock where I am considering going long. Bulls & bears should discuss and listen to each others points of view. In this case though, I think the bears are wrong, and am looking fwd to banking my profit as OPAY recovers to c.400p, which I think is likely in the next few weeks.
Have a good Xmas, and thanks for all the interesting views & exposes over the last year!
Regards, Paul.
Jane
Tom, here’s an article from “Forbes” on the decline in casino revenues in Macao. If OPAY’s main customer is one of the casino operators there, then this would hurt OPAY in 2015. This article refers to a forecast 20% Y/Y decline in Q1/15 casino revenues.
“ Forbes Asia 12/01/2014 @ 9:17AM 2 475 views [NOTE: that is December 1, 2014]
Macau November Revenue Falls 19.6% To Lowest Since 2012
Comment Now
Follow Comments
Another month, another set of ugly numbers from the world’s casino capital. Macau’s gross gaming revenue (GGR) in November fell 19.6% from a year ago to 24.3 billion Macau patacas (MOP; US$3.03 billion), roughly in line with forecasts. That’s the lowest GGR total since September 2012, when casinos took in MOP23.9 billion, the low for that year and the last time monthly GGR fell short of $3 billion.
Through the first 11 months of this year, after six straight months of declines, Macau GGR is up a scant 0.3% or $118.5 million, likely heading for its first annual fall since liberalization began with the opening of Sand Macao in 2004.
In Hong Kong trading on Monday, shares in the gaming operators fell, except for Melco Crown Entertainment which was up throughout the day and closed ahead 0.61%. The other operators’ share price losses were less than the benchmark Hang Seng Index’s brutal 2.58% drop, with the exception of Galaxy Entertainment Group, down 2.64%, and Macau Legend Development, which runs two casinos on the peninsula under the license of SJM Holdings, down 4.19%, briefly touching its low for the year.
Despite improving investor sentiment over the past six weeks, analysts have been warning that enthusiasm hasn’t been matched by improving fundamentals. In a report issued last week, Credit Suisse analysts Kenneth Fong and Isis Wong say mass market revenue continues to fall and last month’s rate cut by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) doesn’t address key Macau issues including the impact of the anti-corruption campaign, tightening of travel visas and the smoking ban that took effect in October. They also caution earnings expectations remain inflated. Their EDITDA estimates are 11.6% below consensus for this quarter and next year. On current trends, they warn Wynn Macau could miss fourth quarter estimates by 20%.
Morgan Stanley says Macau hasn’t reached the bottom yet in either revenue or share price declines. After a large investor conference and visiting Macau, analysts Praveen Choudhary, Alex Poon and Thomas Allen write, “Grind mass could be the last shoe to drop,” in the current trend of falling revenue. They also note that bet sizes are shrinking across the board. They estimate margins can hold if mass growth tracks at 5%, but declining mass play will impact margins and could lead to promotion competition, putting further pressure on margins, along with increased labor costs, including the new 14th month salary payments.
Wells Fargo Securities says that credit expansion in mainland China has created a bottom in previous Macau gaming downturns and emphasizes, “We are not there yet.” Analysts Cameron McKnight, Rich Cummings and Tiffany Lee see the PBOC rate cut as an indication of continued deceleration in the mainland economy, not a fundamental shift in policy toward looser money. They believe the direct impact of the rate cut will be limited, but see the long term impact as positive. “Indirectly, the action demonstrates Beijing is willing to be accommodative when required, which could signal further rate cuts.” None of that, though, changes the grim short term outlook. The analysts warn President Xi Jinping’s visit to commemorate the 15th anniversary of Macau’s handover later this month may offset the normal trend of December sequential growth from November.
Union Gaming Research Macau suggests December GGR will be roughly similar to November, a year on year December decline of roughly 25%. Analysts Grant Govertsen and Felicity Chiang estimate, barring a December surprise on the upside, GGR for 2014 will decline 2% from last year’s $45.1 billion. They also expect revenue numbers for January and March similar to November and December, with February down approximately 20% from this year’s record $4.75 billion, suggesting an overall revenue decline of 20% for the first quarter of next year. None of the analysts see a recovery until at least the second quarter of 2015.
Still, it beats the heck out of Atlantic City”