The one stop source for breaking news, expert analysis, and podcasts on fast-moving AIM and LSE listed shares

Join ShareProphets at less than 2p per article

> All the big AIM fraud exposés

> 300 articles and podcasts a month

> Hot share tips

> Original investigations by our experienced team

> No ads, no click-bait, no auto-play videos

Find out more

EXPLOSIVE EXCLUSIVE: Why the £10 million claim by Worthington on Rangers is bogus and how Doug Ware tried to line his pockets with Rangers cash

By Tom Winnifrith | Friday 2 October 2015

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

One of the joys of being in London is that folks come to see me from the Square Mile bearing documents of great interest. I shall not name my City Source. But I have obtained documents showing why the £10 million claim by Law Financial against Rangers (RFC) is utterly bogus, that Worthington (WRN) knows it is bogus and how Worthington boss Doug Ware tried to line his own pockets in an obscene fashion at the expense of Worthington going behind the back of poor Aiden Earley and Craig Whyte.

The documents I now possess are from 7 June 2013. On that day Worthington CEO Doug Ware contacted the then Nomad to Rangers FC, Cenkos, offering to settle the outstanding Law Financial litigation which you will remember that Worthington values at £10 million. Ware stresses that Whyte and Earley know nothing of his approach and asks the Cenkos chappy (Jim Durking) not to reveal what is proposed.

Ware admits that Worthington is on the “point of an insolvent liquidation”.  That rather contrasts with what Ware was telling investors via RNS statements. And on that basis he offers to sell Law Financial to Rangers for just £475,000 in cash to make the problem go away.

Actually that would not be £475,000 because Rangers would have been given – as part of this deal - £345,000 of convertible loan notes which came with a first charge on the one assets Worthington then owned that had any value – its old factory in Keighley Yorkshire which was worth c£500,000. And so the net cost to Rangers to get rid of this litigation would have been just £130,000 – for that it would have owned all of Law Financial.

There are however a few other conditions. Ware suggests that an independent tribunal look at the claim and if it is worth any more the difference be paid inRrangers shares at a later date.

Ware also asks for a few other minor matters. Notably that he be appointed as a Non-Executive Deputy Chairman of Rangers (RFC) on a salary of £120,000 per annum plus expenses plus a golden handshake payment in cash up to the non-taxable limit plus a share option deal on a par with the executive directors of Rangers. Oh and that Doug’s pal from Worthington  Richard Spurway should also get a £150,000 one off payment in the most tax efficient way or be employed at £40,000 per year until retirement and that Spurway get 500,000 share options in Rangers as well.

My source confirms that Cenkos was not greatly taken with this proposal.

So what does this tell us?

1. Doug Ware is a greedy bastard who wished to line his own pockets at the expense of shareholders in Worthington. Those shareholders – including poor Aiden Earley and Craig Whyte – should sack him at once.

2.  Worthington was insolvent but neglected to tell its shareholders this as it should have done under LSE Rules

3. Worthington was happy to sell its claim for just £130,000 in cash plus perhaps a few Rangers shares at a later date. Yet it has repeatedly insisted that its claim is worth £10 million. Of course it is not. The claims are groundless as we all know.

Filed under:

Never miss a story.

This area of the site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.

More on RFC



  1. He says Whyte/Earley didn’t know – what we all need to remember the language all of this team speak are lies, its their mother tongue.

    Why it is almost amusing to see the LSE loons saying “they said it in a RNS” or “The Company requested the temporary suspension of its shares”. They struggle with the concept that people lie and are dishonest, being involved in a PLC doesn’t suddenly make someone immune from telling porky pies.

    That magic number 475 cropping up again

    “In May 2014, contracts were exchanged for the sale of our Keighley freehold property for £475,000, completion of the sale is due before the end of September 2014.”

  2. £475,000 again, in convertible loan form this time

  3. I’m sure it is all too much for my pretty little head but does this not put Worthington, Cenkos and Rangers as well as presumably some number of other people or entities in the same sinking boat?

  4. High Court First Instance – Rolls of Court

    Monday 18 April 2016

    Rangers / Worthington / Law Financial / Nunaminerals / Nunaglobal / Greenland Mining Management emerging CONglomerate

    Edinburgh HC
    Case Session Date Proceedings Case Reference PF Reference Court Name
    HMA v David GRIER 19-APR-16 Preliminary Hearing Continued SCS/2015-152941 CO14000356 Edinburgh HC
    HMA v Craig WHYTE 19-APR-16 Preliminary Hearing Continued SCS/2015-152941 CO14000356 Edinburgh HC
    HMA v Gary WITHEY 19-APR-16 Preliminary Hearing Continued SCS/2015-152941

  5. Worthington fraud update and do we see details of these emails TW please?

Enter your comment below. Fields marked * are required. You must preview your comment first before finally posting.

Site by Everywhen