Saturday 19 August 2017 The one stop source for free breaking news, expert analysis, and videos on AIM and LSE listed shares

Tom Winnifrith’s share tips of the year 2015 – No 1 Buy InterQuest at a 102p offer

By Tom Winnifrith | Friday 26 December 2014

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

One of my highlights of Christmas was a gathering of the friends of the woman I once referred to as the deluded lefty, that is to say the Mrs. I was ill so, having cooked for them, I retreated to bed with the cats, but coming down for a cup of tea I heard the most deluded of the lot of them (they are nearly all sociology lecturers) opine that she had “applied for research funding to study how black women are suffering in the recession.” Where does one start?

Firstly, she will get that funding and it is YOUR taxes that will fund this vital work. Secondly, you might point out that we are not in a recession so the whole thesis is fundamentally flawed but that will not stop this utter loon from securing funding from the grateful taxpayer which will produce a report concluding that the wicked Tory inspired recession has especially disadvantaged women of colour (you see I know the PC lingo off pat now) and that the taxpayer needs to invest (i.e. piss away more cash) to rectify this.  We live in a mad world.

My point is that the UK is not in a recession. One of my ten macro themes for 2015 (HERE) is that UK GDP growth will be the strongest in Europe and among the strongest in the G8 and thus Steve Moore and I when tipping stocks as buys are looking for UK GDP plays. That brings me to recruitment business InterQuest (ITQ) at a 102p offer - up on the 88p offer at which we first tipped it on the Nifty Fifty.

The value opportunity is that InterQuest shares were weak in the run up to Christmas not because of weak trading but because having put itself up for sale no deal was done. The problem is chairman and founder Gary Ashworth.

That is to say the stumbling block was securing was Gary regards as a fair price, not that there is anything wrong with InterQuest. Most AIM casino chairman own sod all shares in the company’s they run so would have happily accepted any deal and banked a mega bonus for securing a deal. Gary owns almost 30% of InterQuest and so his interests are not that of a grubby bonus seeking corporate swine but those of a shareholder. He wants a fair price.

I know Gary well. He has a great track record on the AIM casino. A gritty northern chappie he will just go away, build up InterQuest both organically and via infill deals and I reckon that in twelve months’ time he will be selling the firm but not for anything less than 150p per share.

At 102p the market cap is £35 million and by the end of next year with no acquisitions debt will be £5 million and clearable within nine months. I was expecting earnings per share of c10p for 2014 and 12p for 2015 but the upbeat trading statement of just before Christmas makes me think that I am light on both numbers and so tentatively I am looking for earnings of 13.5p for 2015 so at 150p the PE is only just over 11. Mid-tier recruiters at the right point in the cycle often exit at 15 times or more so my targets are really not that ambitious.

InterQuest is almost entirely UK based in terms of customers. Its speciality is IT where demand is strong and its biggest customer is the FCA which – as we know – has an unlimited budget as it recruits the brightest and the best to fail completely to tackle financial abuse and crime in this country.

I regard the risks to my numbers as on the upside as Gary is helped by macro-headwinds ( as the economy grows he will have more demand to fill higher margin permanent as opposed to temporary placements) but also because he will execute a number of cute bolt-ons to bulk this company up for the 2015 trade sale. Buy at up to 108p with a 150p to sell target price.

The Nifty Fifty is the premium website of Tom Winnifrith & Steve Moore. To gain access ahead of our next share tip OUT ON DECEMBER 29 go HERE

Filed under:

Never miss a story.

This area of the site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.

More on ITQ



  1. J P Spaghetti

    “Firstly, she will get that funding and it is YOUR taxes that will fund this vital work.”

    If only more people were more aware of the extent to which money from the public coffers is squandered on keeping those of frankly seemingly dubious intellectual capability riding the gravy train at certain institutions (there – I’ve said it), perhaps the rot would be reversed. That’s whilst potentially valuable research continues to be underfunded.

    But then maybe I’m being unfair as – hey – who really needs a free electron laser anyway, for instance? Why do we really need their awesome imaging power to understand more fully the structure of membrane proteins? I mean they’re only thought to be complicit in the development of all manner of nastiness from multiple sclerosis to Alzheimer’s. And nasty as they are it’s not as if they cost the NHS a great deal is it? And even if they can potentially rip out every inner shell electron from atoms of heavy elements before they’ve had chance to expand hydrodynamically (i.e., explode) so the result is something very hot and dense, the sort of conditions that would induce fusion in light elements, who cares? Far more important – surely – that we continue to provide for those who’ve carved for themselves quite a safe and cosy living out of ‘educating’ the rest of us about when we should be offended (and fair play – they work very hard at spotting potential offence). I mean, if we can’t fund both, and with everyone under the age of 30 seemingly a student these days it would appear we can’t, then that must surely be top priority. Speaking of which, though, surely “women of colour” is offensive because it implies that those who are white are elevated beyond the concept of colour and that is inherently discriminatory (as is faux contextualisation before anyone ‘starts’)! Blast – it’s so complicated. I can see how they ‘earn their keep’. But perhaps I was being too analytical there anyway. I mean, far be it from me to expose such a contradiction – right?

    As a passing contemplation, how curious that it was the government of a British PM who performed poorly academically and certainly didn’t attended university (nice enough chap as he seemed – don’t get me wrong – and some of the smartest people I’ve met couldn’t be arsed with formal qualifications) that instigated the general destruction of tertiary education!

    Finally, in keeping with the day, an ex-RSM and good friend of my old man (who ‘popped his clogs’ a long time ago) told me recently that British infantry units are planning to ban boxing. MADNESS!

    OK – should have typed “penultimately”, but this is definitely finally: why-oh-why has such nonsense become so strongly associated with the left (much the way an anti-nuclear-power stance ostensibly did, but I guess that was down to disingenuous contrivance in respect of coal)?

  2. Tom,
    Very interesting my dear Whats on, may consider, know what you mean with the PC brigade, and usually agree with you on most stuff.
    My analysis of UK plc is it looks good compared to Europe because others are crap, we are not that good hence £100 billion deficit annually, just not creating the volume of wealth required, real economy as oppossed to the artificially spun one.
    USA, may be on the hook soon as their so called growth is on the back of fracking, interesting 2015 ahead GLA.

Enter your comment below. Fields marked * are required. You must preview your comment first before finally posting.

Site by Everywhen