From £6.99 per month
ShareProphets
The one stop source for breaking news, expert analysis, and podcasts on fast-moving AIM and LSE listed shares

MINDING THE LSE’S BUSINESS

Join for as low as £6.99 per month

With ShareProphets’ membership, you receive:

• All premium articles

• Tom Winnifrith’s Bearcast

• Access to all the entire nearly 10 year archive

• ShareProphets Daily Newsletter

Latest Views & News

BREAKING: The strange world of Julie "Lingerie on Expenses" Meyer, Lattun Limited & the £3m robbery

By Tom Winnifrith | Saturday 27 March 2021


 


Up until recently, the sole director of UK registered Lattun Limited was Dr Rene Eichenberger. But after his falling out with Julie “Lingerie on Expenses” Meyer, the great Member of the British Empire has had to come out of the shadows and again act as director. And guess what, this is a Julie Meyer company that has made a profit in one year at least. Yes, of course it is just accounting jiggery pokery. Lattun is another worthless black hole which used to be known as Entrepreneur Country. It gets worse. Far worse as I expose below.


First to the financials for Julie’s conference business. The last accounts are for calendar 2019 and were filed on October 6 2020 as micro accounts. They show:




































Year



2019



2018



Fixed Assets



£95,996



£163,781



Current Assets



£331,490



£255,175



Current Liabilities



£862,114



£643,551



Net Current Liabilities



£530,624



£388,376



Net Liabililites



£434,628



£224,395



 


In short, the business appears to be losing money, is almost certainly burning cash, almost certainly has sod all cash and is only surviving by not paying its bills. For followers of Ms Meyer, this is a familiar tale. And so too is the booking of profits that are not really profits and that brings me to the 2018 accounts, once again signed off by Mr Eichenberger but which have all the hallmarks of a Julie Meyer special.


For in 2018, Lattun reported a profit of £2,901,330. Okay there was an operating loss of £243,632 but it would be the bottom line which La Meyer would be shouting about. So what is going on? Turn to Note 8 which explains all.


Lattun was Entrepreneur Country and Julie’s Viva capital, then known as Pelion Partners, bought it on August 16 2018 from the ACE Fund managed by Julie. Viva (then known as Pelion) bought Ariadne Capital Group (in Malta) on July 18 2018 and concluded that the £3.114,962 owed by ECL/Lattun to Ariadne was not recoverable and would have to be written off. That explains the exceptional “profit” and almost eliminated the company’s negative net assets.


But there are a couple of problems here. The first is ownership. The 2016 accounts for Ariadne Capital in London, Julie’s flagship company, show that it too made a big profit that year, just under £3 million. It was on the basis of that profit and net assets of £3.858688 million that Lingerie on Expenses was actively seeking new investors in late 2017 as the business went into administration. So how did Ariadne book such a profit? Simple. It sold Entrepreneur Country to Julie’s ACE Fund. The only problem was that the fund did not pay. It has never paid which is why the administrator discovered that the realisable sum from those £7,154,390 reported assets as at December 21 2016 was in fact….nil. Zero. And Andrew Duncan has still not managed to realise a cent.


So if the fund did not actually pay for ECL, did it really own it? How was it in a position to sell it back to Viva Capital? This, I suggest, is the sort of thing that the ongoing FCA enquiry into Ms Meyer is considering.


There is another matter…the sums owed to Ariadne Capital Group in Malta. How were they owed to Ariadne Capital Group, a business incorporated in Malta on 23 August 2016? If, for instance, you check the calendar 2015 accounts for Entrepreneur Country, you will see that it had current creditors at that point of just over £2 million and it is made explicitly clear that “Ariadne capital Limited will continue to support EntrepreneurCountry Global Limited”. In other words, it was the London entity ponying up to support ECL’s losses so nearly all of that £3 million Ariadne Malta is writing off is cash ponied up by Ariadne London with its diverse shareholder base. So when exactly did Ariadne London (a diverse shareholder base not just Julie Meyer) transfer ownership of this asset (sums owed by ECL)  to Ariadne Malta (owned by Julie Meyer) and for what consideration? The 2016 Ariadne accounts show an increase in debtors from £3.183 million to £7.132 million. That increase largely reflects cash owed by the fund but it is hard to see how the, by then, £3 million owed by ECL could have disappeared. So when did Ariadne London transfer ownership to Ariadne Malta and for how much?


All of this is classic Julie Meyer smoke and mirrors.

This story is available to all readers
ShareProphets is reader-supported journalism

Become a member starting at £6.99 per month for all articles, the Bearcast, and our seven year archive.


Filed under:


Subscribe to our newsletter

Daily digest of our latest stories.



Search ShareProphets

Market News

Complete Coverage

Recent Comments

That Was the Week that Was

 

ICON

Iconic Labs – its alive!

Wednesday »

Bearcast

Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: Family tales

 

SHG

Shanta Gold – a recovery BUY!

 

MUSH

Oscillate RTO – madness

 

MOON

Surely Moonpig is a short at 171p?

 

Atomic

Video: The Road to an Energy Crisis

 

Bear

Beyond Meat is Beyond Redemption.

Friday »

Bearcast

Tom Winnifrith bearcast: Madness!

 

RRR

The Andrew Bell defence at Red Rock