ShareProphets

The one stop source for breaking news, expert analysis, and podcasts on fast-moving AIM and LSE listed shares


Join ShareProphets at less than 2p per article

> All the big AIM fraud exposés

> 300 articles and podcasts a month

> Hot share tips

> Original investigations by our experienced team

> No ads, no click-bait, no auto-play videos

Find out more

Red Flags at Night – Pathfinder Minerals

By Nigel Somerville, The Deputy Sheriff of AIM | Saturday 20 June 2015


Disclosure: I own shares in one or more of the stocks mentioned. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from ShareProphets). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.


Just a short one – the main batch is expected on Friday evenings, not Thursdays. However, ten minutes after the market close on Thursday a rather strange RNS was released by Pathfinder Minerals (PFP). Pathfinder has done absolutely nothing wrong here (apart from issuing this after-hours) but it is indeed most odd all the same. It seems that 8% of the company is likely to be dumped on the market at some point. Or is it 9%? Whatever….Pathfinder announced a holding in company announcement which states:

The Company was notified on 17 June 2015 that Mr Paul Ellison and Mr Gareth Roberts, in their capacity as Joint Administrators for Hill Street Investments plc ("HSI"), are interested in 86,544,983 ordinary 1p shares in Pathfinder, representing 8.34% of the Company's total issued ordinary share capital.

The last submission to Companies House from the Administrator to Hill Street Investments, (see HERE) shows that Hill Street Investments held 96,345,000 shares in Pathfinder (a tad over 9%) across two subsidiaries as at December 2014. So have some of them already been sold? The RNS continues:

HSI was the company through which Mr Timothy Baldwin held the majority of his interests in Pathfinder. Pathfinder is advised that HSI was placed in Administration on 10 January 2014 and thus, from that date, all its assets vested in HSI's Joint Administrators, Mr Ellison and Mr Roberts. Accordingly Mr Baldwin no longer holds a notifiable interest in the share capital of the Company.

Er, what?!! Hill Street went into administration in Jan 2014 – almost a year and a half ago – and it has taken the Administrators and Mr Baldwin (former director of the now ex- AIM cesspit poster boys of RAM, TXO and Cientifica, so he really should know better) until Wednesday of this week to notify the change?

I don’t suppose anyone will do anything about this – no doubt AIM Regulation has been too busy with the 20th anniversary slap-up dinner the other night - but given that the Administrator notified an intention to sell at the Royal Courts of Justice way back in March 2014 (see HERE) this does seem to be just a tad late. More to the point, for Pathfinder’s beleaguered shareholders this is a substantial stock overhang.

Pathfinder itself has been an awful tale of woe, involving court hearings in the UK and Mozambique following still unresolved ownership disputes over a property not far up the coast from where Kenmare (KMR) has (not very successfully) been mining titanium. Good for the lawyers, not for Pathfinder’s investors. For anyone holding (myself included – no sniggering over there in the corner!) perhaps now is a good time to check the price of crisps.


Filed under:


Never miss a story.




This area of the ShareProphets.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ShareProphets.com. ShareProphets.com does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ShareProphets.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ShareProphets.com and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions.


More on PFP


Comments

5 comments

  1. I am a holder ………. a punt I have made a lot on twice running . Will it be a third time lucky? ………. we shall see . We are getting close to an outcome now so I expect these to get mopped up by punters and risk takers ( down to previous lows perhaps) . But so what . If it comes through its another multibag .

  2. Just incase your wondering ………… mines a McCoy Crinkle cut, barbecue flavor , in large , please.


  3. nigel somerville

    Wild – well I guess if you are a determined holder (I can’t work out whether I’m determined or just stupid!) then an overhang could offer a buying opportunity. Hmmm….more Pathfinder, or a bag of Walkers Prawn Cocktail? Decisions, decisions….


  4. drunken sailor

    The stench of Tim Baldwin still hangs over PFP and it goes all the way back to the beginning. It was Tim Baldwin and John McKeon who ran IM minerals which was the company reversed into PFP. The prospectus said that IM minerals was the holder of the licence. It was not! all IM minerals had was an option to buy the licence, which they had not paid to take up. This is what enabled the General to steal the licence and stick it in another company where PFP could not get to it. I am not defending the General and I see the whole thing as one bunch of shysters shafting another bunch of shysters. The general will keep the court action going until he either wins of PFP run out of money and give up. Yes there may be some hype around a seemingly favourable result until the General launches his next appeal or whatever he does. I confidently predict that PFP will never exploit the licence that IM minerals never held, despite the prospectus saying it did.

  5. Drunken …………. there is takeover interest in the ranch next door . No reason why that should not reflect on PFP . I think the RNS is a correction of late news ……… I doubt there is an overhang judging by the way the sp is behaving on dummy trades via L2


Enter your comment below. Fields marked * are required. You must preview your comment first before finally posting.


Site by Everywhen